John
Schlageck
Feb.
'09
With all of the emphasis on our state’s economic well
being, there’s another issue you may not have
heard about that’s also very important to all Kansans.
What’s at stake in this issue is a western Kansas
utility seeking legislative approval for two proposed
coal-fired power plants.
Sunflower Electric Power Corp. is determined to build
these plants near Holcomb in Finney County. Kansas Gov.
Kathleen Sebelius’ administration has been blocking the
plants for more than a year because of their potential
carbon-dioxide emissions.
Expansion of the Holcomb station is being driven by
growing energy needs among electric cooperatives in
Kansas and neighboring states. Power generated from the
Holcomb station expansion could supply additional
electricity for 1.5 million consumers in seven states.
Implications of this decision extend far beyond Holcomb.
Concerns about the uncertainty of our state’s regulatory
environment have been echoed by independent businesses,
manufacturers, agriculture producers, and other
stakeholders from Scammon to Saint Francis, from Rolla
to Reserve, and all points in between – not to mention
those outside our state’s borders who ever thought to do
business in Kansas.
Such demand requires additional generation facilities.
These new facilities will not only reinforce this
region’s power supply needs, but the investment and
creation of jobs from plant construction and operations
will provide additional taxes and employment in western
Kansas.
The
proposed project is expected to cost more than $3.6
billion and has the potential for 1,500 construction
jobs. The new plants would be located on the existing
360-megawatt Holcomb station site. The two additional
supercritical pulverized coal units are each capable of
generating 700 megawatts.
Construction of these new units, next to existing
generation units, will allow for common use of a number
of facilities, including the rail spur, coal receiving
and handling system, water treatment, waste disposal
system and warehouse and control facilities. This will
minimize overall ground disturbance and environmental
impacts associated with development of these facilities.
This expansion plan is a solid move to replace an ever
increasing demand for cleaner coal generation that
Kansas currently has. This project’s state-of-the-art
technologies will enable it to meet federal regulations
in place to protect public health and the environment.
Last
year’s Kansas Department of Health & Environment’s
decision to deny the air permit not only denies our
state the expansion of much needed electricity
generation and increased revenues, it sets a terrible
precedent for economic development in Kansas.
“We
believe KDHE exceeded its authority and our members are
concerned about what arbitrary decisions could be next
that very well could impact agriculture,” said Steve
Baccus, Kansas Farm Bureau president and an Ottawa
County farmer. ”Our state legislature attempted to
address this in the last session by passing bills to
reverse the decision.”
Farmer and rancher members of Farm Bureau continue to
support regulatory certainty in Kansas, and therefore
support efforts to ensure a clean, abundant and
affordable energy supply, including coal.
Rural regions of our state are already paying higher
energy costs than customers in urban areas. This is due
in part to the higher costs to serve areas of sparse
population.
“We
will continue to seek clarification on this issue and
will further develop recommendations for energy policy
that is environmentally responsible and promotes a
viable economic solution to Kansas energy needs,” Baccus
promised.
More than two dozen separate pieces of legislation have
been introduced on the issue, which will likely be at
the forefront throughout the entire session.